WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: THE PAUCITY OF EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY THE DEFENDANTS: AN APPLICATION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CANNOT BE DEFENDED BY "BARE ASSERTION"

The need to provide evidence and not simply make bare assertions is as important in applications as at trial.  Here we see a case where the claimant obtained summary judgment in the face of a “paucity of evidence” from the…

CLAIMANT'S SUCCESSFUL APPEAL AGAINST THE STRIKING OUT OF A CASE BECAUSE A WITNESS STATEMENT HAD NOT BEEN PROVIDED: THE SMALL CLAIMS PROTOCOL IS (VERY) DIFFERENT...

I am grateful to barrister Simon Murray for sending me a copy of this decision that deals with some important procedural issues on the Small Claims Track. In particular it highlights the fact that witness statements are not mandatory on…

EXPERT WATCH 64: LOOKING AT THE CONSEQUENCES OF AN EXPERT REPORTING BADLY

Here we are looking at the consequences of an expert reporting badly. So badly that the parties agreed that a judgment based on the expert’s report must be set aside.    The judge held, however, that earlier orders that prevented…

COST BITES 425: THE EAT OVERTURNS AN ORDER "ASSESSING" COSTS: THE ET APPLIED THE WRONG TEST IN RELATION TO THE CLAIANT'S MEANS, AND THEN FAILED TO SHOW IT HAD ASSESSED THE COSTS SCHEDULE AT ALL..

Here we are (unusually) looking at a decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal.  The case is unusual because the EAT overturned an order as to costs that had been made by the Employment Tribunal.  One of the grounds may be…