Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login

Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers

THE GUIDELINE HOURLY RATES: SEE THEM HERE: UPDATED FOR 2026 RATES

THE GUIDELINE HOURLY RATES: SEE THEM HERE: UPDATED FOR 2026 RATES

April 11, 2024 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content

The Guideline Hourly Rates changed on 1st January 2026. These are set out below.  The  2025 and 2024 rates can be found underneath. Guideline hourly rates 2026 (with previous year’s rates in brackets) Grade Fee Earner London 1 London 2…

SANCTIONS: CASE WATCH

SANCTIONS: CASE WATCH

December 12, 2013 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Useful links

This section  looks at decisions in relation to relief from sanctions and the general principles of CPR 3.9. Often there are links to the decisions themselves, together with links to posts on this blog. CASES IN CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER May 2026…

A CLAIMANT'S SUCCESSFUL APPEAL IN A HOUSING DISREPAIR CLAIM: THE DISTRICT JUDGE WAS WRONG TO ALLOCATE THE MATTER TO THE SMALL CLAIMS TRACK...

A CLAIMANT’S SUCCESSFUL APPEAL IN A HOUSING DISREPAIR CLAIM: THE DISTRICT JUDGE WAS WRONG TO ALLOCATE THE MATTER TO THE SMALL CLAIMS TRACK…

June 3, 2026 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content

I am grateful to Craig Leigh, for sending me a copy of this judgment in relation to an appeal about allocation in a housing disrepair case.   It deals with important principles relating to the allocation of housing disrepair cases. The…

THE TIMES (OR THE COURTS) THEY ARE A CHANGING: MODERNISING THE HIGH COURT THROUGH THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE BUSINESS & PROPERTY DIVISION

THE TIMES (OR THE COURTS) THEY ARE A CHANGING: MODERNISING THE HIGH COURT THROUGH THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE BUSINESS & PROPERTY DIVISION

June 3, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Rule Changes

Early next year there will be a new division of the High Court – the Business and Property Division. This was announced yesterday, with all Business and Property Courts to become part of the new Business and Property Division.  We…

COST BITES 394: COURT OVERTURNS DECISION THAT A CLAIMANT LANDLORD IS ENTITLED TO RECOVER THE COSTS: AWARD OF INTEREST ALSO OVERTURNED

COST BITES 394: COURT OVERTURNS DECISION THAT A CLAIMANT LANDLORD IS ENTITLED TO RECOVER THE COSTS: AWARD OF INTEREST ALSO OVERTURNED

June 3, 2026 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Costs, Interest, Members Content

This is a case where a decision as to costs and interests was overturned on appeal.  The Circuit Judge found that the claimant landlord had no entitlement to claim costs under the terms of the lease.  Further the claim for…

WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: ANALYSIS OF THE ROLE OF WITNESS EVIDENCE IN A CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE TRIAL

WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: ANALYSIS OF THE ROLE OF WITNESS EVIDENCE IN A CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE TRIAL

June 3, 2026 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Clinical Negligence, Members Content, Witness statements

Much of the discussion in relation to clinical negligence cases is based on expert evidence and the standard of care (and rightly so). However it is important that practitioners do not overlook the vital role played by witness evidence. Those…

DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF A CARER IN A FATAL CASE: FULL COMMERCIAL RATE APPLIED TO CLAIM FOR FUTURE LOSS OF SERVICES

DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF A CARER IN A FATAL CASE: FULL COMMERCIAL RATE APPLIED TO CLAIM FOR FUTURE LOSS OF SERVICES

June 2, 2026 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Damages, Fatal Accidents, Members Content, Personal Injury, Webinar

For many years the courts have endeavoured to provide guidance for the appropriate approach to damages when a “carer” is killed.  The principles relating to lost of an “income earner” are generally well established.  Over the past few decades there…

DO LAWYERS (AND EXPERTS) LIKE CHECKLISTS THAT ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE RULES? WELL, I MAY HAVE A TREAT FOR YOU TOMOPRROW

DO LAWYERS (AND EXPERTS) LIKE CHECKLISTS THAT ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE RULES? WELL, I MAY HAVE A TREAT FOR YOU TOMOPRROW

June 2, 2026 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Credibility of experts, Expert evidence, Experts, Webinar

Checklists are always a feature of discussions I have with publishers and legal professionals.  I have prepared have created a whole series of checklists for lawyers (9 in total)  and a series for experts (6),  plus a “Judicial Red Flags”…

SERVICE POINTS 45: A SOLICITOR FAILS TO CHECK THE CE FILE AND 5,000 CLAIMS GO UP IN SMOKE:  SEVERAL IMPORTANT LESSONS HERE, INCLUDING THE NEED TO MAKE AN APPLICATION FOR RELIEF PROMPTLY...

SERVICE POINTS 45: A SOLICITOR FAILS TO CHECK THE CE FILE AND 5,000 CLAIMS GO UP IN SMOKE: SEVERAL IMPORTANT LESSONS HERE, INCLUDING THE NEED TO MAKE AN APPLICATION FOR RELIEF PROMPTLY…

June 2, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

This case, where judgment was given today,  is essential reading for anyone litigating using  CE-File. It is also essential to anyone involved in group litigation.  This is  a case where 5,000 claimants were refused relief from sanctions. That initial difficulty…

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN A PARTY DOES NOT RESPOND TO A NOTICE TO ADMIT FACTS  (THERE IS NO "DEEMED ADMISSION") PLUS ANOTHER POSSIBLE "HALLUCINATED" "FICTITIOUS" RULE

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN A PARTY DOES NOT RESPOND TO A NOTICE TO ADMIT FACTS (THERE IS NO “DEEMED ADMISSION”) PLUS ANOTHER POSSIBLE “HALLUCINATED” “FICTITIOUS” RULE

June 2, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Artificial Intelligence, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content

This case has two important practical points. Firstly (contrary to the case put forward by the claimant) a failure to respond to a Notice to Admit facts does not give rise to an “implied admission” by the recipient of the…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED: SOME DELAYS WERE UNEXPLAINED AND THERE WERE OTHER BREACHES OF THE RULES: SOME LESSONS ON COMPLIANCE HERE...

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED: SOME DELAYS WERE UNEXPLAINED AND THERE WERE OTHER BREACHES OF THE RULES: SOME LESSONS ON COMPLIANCE HERE…

June 2, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

We are looking at an (unsuccessful) application for relief from sanctions in a family case.  A husband sought permission to appeal some 10 1/2 months out of time.  What is particularly interesting here are the judge accepted that some delay…

COST BITES 393: A CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENT BETWEEN LAW FIRMS WAS VALID: THERE WAS NO BREACH (AND IF THERE WAS IT WAS NOT MATERIAL): FRESH OFF THE PRESS - JUDGMENT THIS AFTERNOON

COST BITES 393: A CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENT BETWEEN LAW FIRMS WAS VALID: THERE WAS NO BREACH (AND IF THERE WAS IT WAS NOT MATERIAL): FRESH OFF THE PRESS – JUDGMENT THIS AFTERNOON

June 1, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Conditional Fee Agreements, Costs, Members Content

I am grateful to Jamie Carpenter KC for drawing my attention to this judgment given this afternoon. It relates to an interesting dispute between law firms. The claimant had entered into a CFA with the defendant. The defendant argued that…

AN EASY MISTAKE TO MAKE: HOW A CRUCIAL TIME LIMIT FOR APPEALING WAS MISSED: MISLABELLING OF THE FILES: THIS WAS NOT A "MINOR ERROR..."

AN EASY MISTAKE TO MAKE: HOW A CRUCIAL TIME LIMIT FOR APPEALING WAS MISSED: MISLABELLING OF THE FILES: THIS WAS NOT A “MINOR ERROR…”

June 1, 2026 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content

Here we look at how a simple mistake in the naming of a file led to a potentially disastrous problem when it led to an appeal being out of time. The wrong documents were sent to the court when an…

AN APPEAL OVER A TIME ESTIMATE FOR TRIAL: THIS SHOULD NOT LAST 15 DAYS, NOR WILL IT BE DONE IN 5:  EIGHT DAYS REMAINS THE CORRECT CONCLUSION

AN APPEAL OVER A TIME ESTIMATE FOR TRIAL: THIS SHOULD NOT LAST 15 DAYS, NOR WILL IT BE DONE IN 5: EIGHT DAYS REMAINS THE CORRECT CONCLUSION

June 1, 2026 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content

This blog has covered issues relating to time estimates many times. I cannot recall, however, a case where there has been an appeal over a judicial determination of a time estimate for a trial. We have such a case here. …

EXPERT WATCH 48: HOW AN EXPERT WITNESS CAN LOSE CREDIBILITY AT TRIAL (IN A CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASE - BUT THE PRINCIPLES ARE UNIVERSAL...)

EXPERT WATCH 48: HOW AN EXPERT WITNESS CAN LOSE CREDIBILITY AT TRIAL (IN A CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASE – BUT THE PRINCIPLES ARE UNIVERSAL…)

June 1, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Clinical Negligence, Credibility of experts, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content

Some areas of litigation rely heavily on expert evidence. Clinical negligence is often one of those areas. It is always interesting to read judicial views when a matter reaches trial.  Here was have a judgment where the judge considered aspects…

BACK TO BASICS MONDAY: A LITIGANT CANNOT APPLY TO SET ASIDE A DECISION MADE WITHOUT A HEARING WHEN THEY SPECIFICALLY ASKED FOR THIS AND HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE SUBMISSIONS

BACK TO BASICS MONDAY: A LITIGANT CANNOT APPLY TO SET ASIDE A DECISION MADE WITHOUT A HEARING WHEN THEY SPECIFICALLY ASKED FOR THIS AND HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE SUBMISSIONS

June 1, 2026 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content

Here we look at a recent decision that has major practical implications for  anyone making an application, or anyone disgruntled with a court decision.  The applicant asked, specifically, for an application to be considered on paper.  The matter was considered…

THE APIL FATAL ACCIDENTS WEBINAR SERIES 2026: SEVEN WEBINARS TO HELP NEGOTIATE THIS DIFFICULT AREA OF LAW AND PRACTICE

THE APIL FATAL ACCIDENTS WEBINAR SERIES 2026: SEVEN WEBINARS TO HELP NEGOTIATE THIS DIFFICULT AREA OF LAW AND PRACTICE

May 31, 2026 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Fatal Accidents, Webinar, Witness statements

Fatal accident claims are among the most complex and high-stakes cases a  lawyer can handle. They are not simply personal injury claims in which the injured person has died. Fatal accident litigation is governed by a distinct legal framework, involves…

WHOSE EXPERT EVIDENCE IS GOING TO BE ACCEPTED AT TRIAL? PERSONAL INJURY: WEBINAR 3rd JUNE 2026

WHOSE EXPERT EVIDENCE IS GOING TO BE ACCEPTED AT TRIAL? PERSONAL INJURY: WEBINAR 3rd JUNE 2026

May 29, 2026 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Credibility of experts, Expert evidence, Experts, Webinar

There is no shortage of posts on this blog where judges have been critical of expert witnesses (and sometimes those who instruct them). This webinar examines how courts assess and evaluate expert evidence in personal injury litigation, with a particular…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 79: COURT REJECTS CLAIMANT'S AMENDMENT APPLICATION BECAUSE THERE WERE "REASONABLY ARGUABLE" ISSUES IN RELATION TO LIMITATION

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 79: COURT REJECTS CLAIMANT’S AMENDMENT APPLICATION BECAUSE THERE WERE “REASONABLY ARGUABLE” ISSUES IN RELATION TO LIMITATION

May 29, 2026 · by gexall · in Amendment, Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Limitation, Members Content, Statements of Case

Here we continue the theme of today in looking at applications to amend.  In this case the application was unsuccessful because it sought to raise issues that may be subject to a limitation defence.  The judge rejected the argument that…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 78: CLAIMANT REFUSED PERMISSION TO AMEND PARTICULARS IN CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE/FATAL ACCIDENT CLAIM

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 78: CLAIMANT REFUSED PERMISSION TO AMEND PARTICULARS IN CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE/FATAL ACCIDENT CLAIM

May 29, 2026 · by gexall · in Amendment, Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

The theme for today may well be unsuccessful applications to amend pleadings. Here we have what may be regarded as an “extreme” case. The claimant issued proceedings relying on medical evidence that actually contradicted the pleaded case.  This was pointed…

THROWBACK FRIDAY: AMENDING PLEADINGS : A REVIEW OF THE PRINCIPLES: WHAT IS MEANT BY "LATE"? (MAY 2015)

THROWBACK FRIDAY: AMENDING PLEADINGS : A REVIEW OF THE PRINCIPLES: WHAT IS MEANT BY “LATE”? (MAY 2015)

May 29, 2026 · by gexall · in Amendment, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

If we have a theme for today it relates to applications to amend pleadings.  This is, needless to say, a regular topic on this site.  The issues and problems that litigants faced 11 years ago still occur in cases we…

COST BITES 392 : BOTH PARTIES MADE "PART 36 OFFERS": BOTH WERE INEFFECTIVE (AND THE MASTER WOULD NOT HAVE IMPOSED THE USUAL CONSEQUENCES EVEN IF THEY WERE VALID...)

COST BITES 392 : BOTH PARTIES MADE “PART 36 OFFERS”: BOTH WERE INEFFECTIVE (AND THE MASTER WOULD NOT HAVE IMPOSED THE USUAL CONSEQUENCES EVEN IF THEY WERE VALID…)

May 28, 2026 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Part 36

Here we have a case where both parties made Part 36 offers.  The court held that the offers were ineffective. One because the offeror had not beaten their offer on a true “like-for-like” comparison. The other offer was held not…

PRACTICE DIRECTION CHANGES INTRODUCED YESTERDAY: NEW PROVISIONS IN THE DAMAGES CLAIM PORTAL: "OTHER REMEDY" CLAIMS CAN NOW BE MADE

PRACTICE DIRECTION CHANGES INTRODUCED YESTERDAY: NEW PROVISIONS IN THE DAMAGES CLAIM PORTAL: “OTHER REMEDY” CLAIMS CAN NOW BE MADE

May 28, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Rule Changes

Some new provisions relating to the Damages Claim Portal came into effect yesterday, introduced in Practice Direction 51ZB (the Damages Claims Pilot) . Essentially these allow “other remedy claims” to be issued alongside damages claims. It also extends the portal…

PERSONAL INJURY POINTS 15: THE STUDENTS LOAN COMPANY MAY BE AN "EMANATION OF THE STATE": SOME INTERESTING ISSUES HERE: THESE ARE ISSUES OF LAW - NOT ONE ON WHICH A WITNESS CAN EXPRESS AN OPINION OR VIEW...

PERSONAL INJURY POINTS 15: THE STUDENTS LOAN COMPANY MAY BE AN “EMANATION OF THE STATE”: SOME INTERESTING ISSUES HERE: THESE ARE ISSUES OF LAW – NOT ONE ON WHICH A WITNESS CAN EXPRESS AN OPINION OR VIEW…

May 28, 2026 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Personal Injury

The Court of Appeal considered some interesting issues in this case.  Firstly in relation to the direct applicability of EC directives; secondly in relation to whether a particular body was an emanation of the state.  It is not clear how…

PERSONAL INJURY POINTS 14: CLAIMANT FAILS IN SLIPPING CASE: THERE WAS A "HYPOTHETICAL" RISK OF SLIPPING WHICH THE DEFENDANT DID NOT NEED TO DEAL WITH

PERSONAL INJURY POINTS 14: CLAIMANT FAILS IN SLIPPING CASE: THERE WAS A “HYPOTHETICAL” RISK OF SLIPPING WHICH THE DEFENDANT DID NOT NEED TO DEAL WITH

May 28, 2026 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Personal Injury

We are continuing our review of personal injury cases with another slipping case where the claim failed (don’t worry the imbalance will be addressed in due course). However the reason in this case was simply because the matter that caused…

PERSONAL INJURY POINTS 13: WHERE THERE IS BLAME THERE IS NOT ALWAYS A CLAIM: THE DEFENDANT BREACHED THEIR DUTY BUT THE CLAIMANT'S ACTION FAILED

PERSONAL INJURY POINTS 13: WHERE THERE IS BLAME THERE IS NOT ALWAYS A CLAIM: THE DEFENDANT BREACHED THEIR DUTY BUT THE CLAIMANT’S ACTION FAILED

May 28, 2026 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Personal Injury

Today we will, primarily, be looking at personal injury and clinical negligence issues.  Here we look at a case where the claim failed even though the judge found there was a breach of duty.  The difficulty for the claimant was…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 77: CASE STRUCK OUT: THERE WAS "INSUFFICIENT PLEADINGS OF FACT FROM WHICH IT COULD BE INFERRED THAT ANY OF THE ALLEGATIONS HAVE A REAL PROSPET OF SUCCESS"

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 77: CASE STRUCK OUT: THERE WAS “INSUFFICIENT PLEADINGS OF FACT FROM WHICH IT COULD BE INFERRED THAT ANY OF THE ALLEGATIONS HAVE A REAL PROSPET OF SUCCESS”

May 27, 2026 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Statements of Case

Here we look at a case where the Master struck out the claimants’ pleaded case alleging unlawful means conspiracy, breach of contract and a claim in negligence.  The Master held that that the pleadings were non-compliant and did not plead…

SERVICE POINTS 44: LOCAL AUTHORITY FAILS TO SERVE PROPERLY ON INTERESTED PARTIES TO PROPOSED APPEAL: THE WHOLE APPEAL FAILS

SERVICE POINTS 44: LOCAL AUTHORITY FAILS TO SERVE PROPERLY ON INTERESTED PARTIES TO PROPOSED APPEAL: THE WHOLE APPEAL FAILS

May 27, 2026 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

Here we have another case of a failure to serve a claim form properly.  This time a local authority failed to serve interested parties to an appeal because, rather than sending the claim forms to them personally, they were sent…

WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: TIPS FOR TESTIFYING IN COURT: FROM THE UNITED STATE'S ATTORNEY'S OFFICE (MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA)

WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: TIPS FOR TESTIFYING IN COURT: FROM THE UNITED STATE’S ATTORNEY’S OFFICE (MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA)

May 27, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

Earlier posts have written on the issue of how little guidance there is for those attending courts (civil courts in particular) to give evidence.   An earlier post provided useful links. Here we look at the guidance given in one of…

SERVICE POINTS 43: WHY CPR 6.15 IS NOT THE "CAVALRY" COMING OVER THE HILL TO SAVE YOU IF THE CLAIM FORM HAS NOT BEEN SERVED PROPERLY

SERVICE POINTS 43: WHY CPR 6.15 IS NOT THE “CAVALRY” COMING OVER THE HILL TO SAVE YOU IF THE CLAIM FORM HAS NOT BEEN SERVED PROPERLY

May 26, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Service of the claim form

There must be many anxious litigators who have read the words of CPR 6.15 and happily assumed that their case is saved. On the face of it this rule gives the court a wide power to authorise service by another…

SERVICE POINTS 42: A £82 MILLION POUND FAILS BECAUSE THE CLAIM FORM WAS SENT BY EMAIL TO SOLICITORS WHO HAD NOT STATED THAT THEY WOULD ACCEPT SERVICE: AN OLD ISSUE (AND A BIG ONE)

SERVICE POINTS 42: A £82 MILLION POUND FAILS BECAUSE THE CLAIM FORM WAS SENT BY EMAIL TO SOLICITORS WHO HAD NOT STATED THAT THEY WOULD ACCEPT SERVICE: AN OLD ISSUE (AND A BIG ONE)

May 26, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Professional negligence,, Service of the claim form

This will not be the only case about (mis) service of the claim form this week, however it may be the largest.  We have the “traditional” pattern of a claimant leaving service until the very last day and then serving…

COST BITES 391: TOO  MUCH CORRESPONDENCE, GRADE C RATES NOT INCREASED AND "SO CALLED" SKELETON ARGUMENTS, WHICH REPEAT THE CONTENTS OF OVER-LENGTHY WITNESS STATEMENTS

COST BITES 391: TOO MUCH CORRESPONDENCE, GRADE C RATES NOT INCREASED AND “SO CALLED” SKELETON ARGUMENTS, WHICH REPEAT THE CONTENTS OF OVER-LENGTHY WITNESS STATEMENTS

May 26, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Witness statements

There are some interesting observations in the short judgment on costs in this case.  There was too much correspondence, “witness statements” were in reality skeleton arguments, with the contents then repeated in skeleton arguments.  Furthermore a “good” Grade C is…

AVOIDING THE PITFALLS: BUNDLES, WITNESSES AND PREPARING FOR TRIAL: WEBINAR ON 29th MAY 2026: IT MAY BE A WHOLE BUNDLE OF FUN

AVOIDING THE PITFALLS: BUNDLES, WITNESSES AND PREPARING FOR TRIAL: WEBINAR ON 29th MAY 2026: IT MAY BE A WHOLE BUNDLE OF FUN

May 26, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Bundles, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Webinar

In Serra -v- Harvey [2024], wasted costs were ordered on an indemnity basis against the claimant’s solicitors because the lateness and condition of the trial bundles. The bundles were described as “haphazard”.  This is just one of numerous posts on…

COST BITES 391: COURT OF APPEAL UPHOLDS DECISION THAT SOLICITOR'S BILL SHOULD BE ASSESSED AT "NIL":  THERE IS NO "RESTITUTIONARY" RIGHT TO DAMAGES WHERE THE CFA ITSELF MADE EXPRESS PROVISIONS FOR THESE CIRCUMSTANCES

COST BITES 391: COURT OF APPEAL UPHOLDS DECISION THAT SOLICITOR’S BILL SHOULD BE ASSESSED AT “NIL”: THERE IS NO “RESTITUTIONARY” RIGHT TO DAMAGES WHERE THE CFA ITSELF MADE EXPRESS PROVISIONS FOR THESE CIRCUMSTANCES

May 26, 2026 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Conditional Fee Agreements, Costs, Members Content

I wrote about this case in August 2025 “Here we have a case that could well bring tears to the eyes of any litigator who works on a conditional fee basis.  For the second time, on appeal, the claimant solicitor’s…

THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE  - LANDING SOLICITORS IN SERIOUS TROUBLE AGAIN (AND DON'T BLAME THE AI FOR EVERYTHING - IT ACTUALLY GAVE OUT WARNINGS TO CHECK...)

THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE – LANDING SOLICITORS IN SERIOUS TROUBLE AGAIN (AND DON’T BLAME THE AI FOR EVERYTHING – IT ACTUALLY GAVE OUT WARNINGS TO CHECK…)

May 25, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Artificial Intelligence, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Costs, Members Content, Witness statements

One day the incorrect use of AI to cite “hallucinated” authorities is going to ruin someone’s career. It may have done so already, there are a number of SRA investigations pending.   The example we look at here is highly educational…

BACK TO BASICS (BANK HOLIDAY) MONDAY: A REMINDER OF WHAT A DIFFERENCE A DAY MAKES: THE PROFOUND DIFFERENCE IN THE WAY THE COURT APPROACHES A PROSPECTIVE APPLICATION FOR AN EXTENSION

BACK TO BASICS (BANK HOLIDAY) MONDAY: A REMINDER OF WHAT A DIFFERENCE A DAY MAKES: THE PROFOUND DIFFERENCE IN THE WAY THE COURT APPROACHES A PROSPECTIVE APPLICATION FOR AN EXTENSION

May 25, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

It is important to remember the major difference in the court’s approach to a an application for an extension that is made ahead of the date of compliance compared to one that is made afterwards.  The governing principles are very different….

COST BITES 390: THE COURT OF APPEAL,  "LATE" WITNESS STATEMENTS, THE COPPERS AND THE COSTS

COST BITES 390: THE COURT OF APPEAL, “LATE” WITNESS STATEMENTS, THE COPPERS AND THE COSTS

May 22, 2026 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

We looked earlier at the Court of Appeal decision yesterday in relation to relief from sanctions.  Here we look at the judgment in relation to the costs of the hearing below and of the appeal itself.  As we shall see…

AVOIDING UNDERSETTLEMENT: WEBINAR 26th MAY 2026: NOW WITH ADDED CHECKLISTS

AVOIDING UNDERSETTLEMENT: WEBINAR 26th MAY 2026: NOW WITH ADDED CHECKLISTS

May 22, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Clinical Negligence, Costs, Damages, Members Content, Personal Injury, Webinar, Witness statements

Allegations of undersettlement of personal injury actions are not uncommon. There is an entire industry specialising in looking at solicitor’s files. This webinar aims to help practitioners avoid such assertions and be able to provide clear and robust replies if…

THE COURT OF APPEAL ALLOWED DEFENDANT TO RELY ON WITNESS STATEMENTS SERVED "LATE": THE CRUCIAL DISTINCTION BETWEEN "IN TIME" AND "OUT OF TIME" APPLICATIONS TO EXTEND TIME

THE COURT OF APPEAL ALLOWED DEFENDANT TO RELY ON WITNESS STATEMENTS SERVED “LATE”: THE CRUCIAL DISTINCTION BETWEEN “IN TIME” AND “OUT OF TIME” APPLICATIONS TO EXTEND TIME

May 22, 2026 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

I am grateful to Barrister Simon Brindle for sending me a copy of the judgment of this Court of Appeal judgment given yesterday.  It relates primarily to the major distinction between an application made “ahead” of time and one made…

YOU CAN'T DELIBERATELY DECIDE TO IGNORE COURT (OR TRIBUNAL) DIRECTIONS: HMRC INVOLVED IN "CONTUMELIOUS" CONDUCT, ITS (LATE) APOLOGY GIVEN LITTLE WEIGHT

YOU CAN’T DELIBERATELY DECIDE TO IGNORE COURT (OR TRIBUNAL) DIRECTIONS: HMRC INVOLVED IN “CONTUMELIOUS” CONDUCT, ITS (LATE) APOLOGY GIVEN LITTLE WEIGHT

May 22, 2026 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

Here we have a case of a litigant (the HMRC no less) making a deliberate decision to ignore Tribunal directions.  It then attempted to justify that decision by stating  “That was a deliberate and proportionate case management decision, taken in…

COST BITES 389: THE SRA IS LIABLE TO PAY THE COSTS OF AN APPEAL WHERE IT WAS THE ORIGINAL APPELLANT ITS POSITION IS "MORE AKIN TO THAT OF A NORMAL LITIGANT"

COST BITES 389: THE SRA IS LIABLE TO PAY THE COSTS OF AN APPEAL WHERE IT WAS THE ORIGINAL APPELLANT ITS POSITION IS “MORE AKIN TO THAT OF A NORMAL LITIGANT”

May 22, 2026 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content

Here we consider an issue that has some relevance to the profession as a whole.  Should the SRA be liable to pay the costs of an appeal from the SDT?  In this case the SRA was the instigator of the…

THROWBACK FRIDAY: "WHAT CAN A DEFENDANT ARGUE ABOUT DAMAGES WHEN ITS DEFENCE IS STRUCK OUT?" (MAY 2017)

THROWBACK FRIDAY: “WHAT CAN A DEFENDANT ARGUE ABOUT DAMAGES WHEN ITS DEFENCE IS STRUCK OUT?” (MAY 2017)

May 22, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Damages, Default judgment,, Members Content, Striking out

Recent cases have considered the question of what a defendant can argue as to damages when a claimant has obtained summary judgment. Here we look at a case that considers the position when the defendant’s defence has been struck out. …

WOULD BE APPELLANT FAILS TO COMPLY WITH SEVEN DAY DEADLINE: ARGUMENTS ABOUT "PUBLIC INTEREST" FAILS TO TAKE OFF: THE IMPORTANCE OF KNOWING TIME LIMITS...

WOULD BE APPELLANT FAILS TO COMPLY WITH SEVEN DAY DEADLINE: ARGUMENTS ABOUT “PUBLIC INTEREST” FAILS TO TAKE OFF: THE IMPORTANCE OF KNOWING TIME LIMITS…

May 21, 2026 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

Here we have a case where the “would be” appellant failed to obtain permission to appeal out of time.  They failed to notice that the time limits for appealing this specific type of decision had been changed two months prior…

MAZUR MATTERS 62: THE REVISED COURT OF APPEAL JUDGMENT: SOME SMALL BUT SIGNIFICANT REVISIONS

MAZUR MATTERS 62: THE REVISED COURT OF APPEAL JUDGMENT: SOME SMALL BUT SIGNIFICANT REVISIONS

May 21, 2026 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content

There is a revised version of the Court of Appeal judgment in Mazur.  Some paragraphs were amended slightly (but significantly). These amendments do not appeal to have made their way to the version of the judgment that is publicly available….

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 76: APPLYING FOR PERMISSION TO AMEND THE DAY BEFORE THE COURT OF APPEAL HEARING, WITH NO NOTICE GIVEN: HAVE A GUESS HOW THIS WENT...

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 76: APPLYING FOR PERMISSION TO AMEND THE DAY BEFORE THE COURT OF APPEAL HEARING, WITH NO NOTICE GIVEN: HAVE A GUESS HOW THIS WENT…

May 21, 2026 · by gexall · in Amendment, Appeals, Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Default judgment,, Members Content, Statements of Case

There have been quite a few cases about pleading recently.  This case is interesting because it makes the point that after  a default judgment is entered a claimant is only entitled to have damages assessed on the basis of their…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 75:  A CLAIMANT DOES NOT ALWAYS NEED TO PLEAD A CLAIM FOR INTEREST: AN INTERESTING POINT... BUT BE VERY WARY...

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 75: A CLAIMANT DOES NOT ALWAYS NEED TO PLEAD A CLAIM FOR INTEREST: AN INTERESTING POINT… BUT BE VERY WARY…

May 21, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Interest, Members Content, Statements of Case

Here we look at an argument that a claimant was not entitled to interest because it was not pleaded. The judge rejected the argument on two grounds. Firstly that CPR 16 does not apply to Part 8 claims; secondly that…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 74: A PARTY CANNOT SIMPLY SEEK TO AMEND THE LIST OF ISSUES TO INCLUDE AN ISSUE THAT IT HAS NEVER PLEADED

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 74: A PARTY CANNOT SIMPLY SEEK TO AMEND THE LIST OF ISSUES TO INCLUDE AN ISSUE THAT IT HAS NEVER PLEADED

May 20, 2026 · by gexall · in Amendment, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

Here we have an unusual case in that the defendant, rather than seeking to amend its defence, sought permission to amend the list of issues to enable it to argue a new point which (the judge found) had not been…

WEBINARS AVAILABLE ON DEMAND: WITNESS STATEMENTS; MAZUR; INFORMING THE CLIENT ABOUT THE COSTS OF LITIGATION AND PART 36: A HEADY BREW TO LIGHTEN UP ANY LITIGATOR'S DAY...

WEBINARS AVAILABLE ON DEMAND: WITNESS STATEMENTS; MAZUR; INFORMING THE CLIENT ABOUT THE COSTS OF LITIGATION AND PART 36: A HEADY BREW TO LIGHTEN UP ANY LITIGATOR’S DAY…

May 20, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Costs, Webinar, Witness statements

Four webinars are now available “on demand” from Civil Litigation Brief: PD57AC; Mazur in the Court of Appeal; Informing the Client about the Costs of Litigation; Part 36 recent developments. THE COSTS (The costs are £75.00 plus VAT if you…

A CLAIMANT'S PART 36 OFFER THAT GAVE A 9% DISCOUNT WAS "SOBER AND REALISTIC": IT WAS NOT UNJUST FOR THE DEFENDANT TO FACE THE NORMAL CONSEQUENCES OF FAILING TO BEAT IT

A CLAIMANT’S PART 36 OFFER THAT GAVE A 9% DISCOUNT WAS “SOBER AND REALISTIC”: IT WAS NOT UNJUST FOR THE DEFENDANT TO FACE THE NORMAL CONSEQUENCES OF FAILING TO BEAT IT

May 20, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Part 36

Here we have another case where the court considered an argument that it was “unjust” for an unsuccessful defendant to face the normal Part 36 consequences when they had failed to beat a claimant’s Part 36 offer.  This judgment shows…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 73: COURT STRIKES OUT CLAIM FOR £2.1 MILLION FOLLOWING McLAREN CATCHING FIRE: THE CASE WAS NOT PROPERLY PARTICULARISED

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 73: COURT STRIKES OUT CLAIM FOR £2.1 MILLION FOLLOWING McLAREN CATCHING FIRE: THE CASE WAS NOT PROPERLY PARTICULARISED

May 20, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case, Striking out

Here we have a case where the judge considers in considerable detail the principles relating to pleading, the striking out of pleadings, and the possibility of being allowed to amend.  None of these favoured the claimant. “It is not sufficient…

WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: WITNESS EVIDENCE, A LATE APPLICATION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND THE LAW OF UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES...

WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: WITNESS EVIDENCE, A LATE APPLICATION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND THE LAW OF UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES…

May 20, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

Here we have an example of a litigation strategy backfiring. The applicant made a (late) application for summary judgment to be heard on the first day of the trial. The respondents filed evidence in response to the application.  Much of…

AVOIDING UNDERSETTLEMENT: PROTECTING THE CLIENT AND PROTECTING YOURSELF:  WEBINAR 26th MAY 2026

AVOIDING UNDERSETTLEMENT: PROTECTING THE CLIENT AND PROTECTING YOURSELF: WEBINAR 26th MAY 2026

May 19, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Clinical Negligence, Damages, Personal Injury, Webinar

This webinar examines claims of under-settlement brought against claimant solicitors, focusing on how courts determine whether professional negligence has occurred in the handling, settlement, or litigation of a case. It explores key case law where negligence was both established and…

1 2 … 144 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.3K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • A CLAIMANT’S SUCCESSFUL APPEAL IN A HOUSING DISREPAIR CLAIM: THE DISTRICT JUDGE WAS WRONG TO ALLOCATE THE MATTER TO THE SMALL CLAIMS TRACK…
  • THE TIMES (OR THE COURTS) THEY ARE A CHANGING: MODERNISING THE HIGH COURT THROUGH THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE BUSINESS & PROPERTY DIVISION
  • COST BITES 394: COURT OVERTURNS DECISION THAT A CLAIMANT LANDLORD IS ENTITLED TO RECOVER THE COSTS: AWARD OF INTEREST ALSO OVERTURNED
  • WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: ANALYSIS OF THE ROLE OF WITNESS EVIDENCE IN A CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE TRIAL
  • DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF A CARER IN A FATAL CASE: FULL COMMERCIAL RATE APPLIED TO CLAIM FOR FUTURE LOSS OF SERVICES

Top Posts

  • A FIRM OF SOLICITORS ISSUED PROCEEDINGS WITHOUT AUTHORITY TO DO SO: ORDERED TO PAY £900,000 ON ACCOUNT OF COSTS: SOME EXPENSIVE LESSONS HERE...
  • COST BITES 386: THREATS TO REPORT THE DEFENDANTS' SOLICITORS TO THE SRA WAS ONE OF THE REASONS THE CLAIMANT HAD TO PAY COSTS ON AN INDEMNITY BASIS: WEAPONISERS BEWARE
  • ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE CITATION OF MISLEADING AUTHORITIES: ANOTHER WEEK, ANOTHER CASE: IF YOUR NAME IS ON THE DOCUMENT YOU "OWN" IT...
  • THROWBACK FRIDAY: LAWYERS FAILURE TO PROVIDE OVERSIGHT OF EXPERTS LEADS TO EXCLUSION OF THEIR EVIDENCE: EXPERT EVIDENCE IS “NOT A MATTER OF RIGHT” (MAY 2021)
  • COST BITES 385: THE COURTS SHOULD BE WARY OF DECIDING PRELIMINARY APPLICATIONS AND ISSUES ON A PROVISIONAL ASSESSMENT: THIS COULD UNDERMINE THE WHOLE PURPOSE OF THE REGIME

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.