![THE GUIDELINE HOURLY RATES: SEE THEM HERE: UPDATED FOR 2025 RATES](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/hourglass_time_sand_transience_7-1.jpg?resize=636%2C310&ssl=1)
The Guideline Hourly Rates changed on 1st January 2025. These are set out below. The 2024 rates can be found underneath. Guideline hourly rates 2025 Grade Fee earner London 1 London 2 London 3 National 1 National 2 A Solicitors…
![SANCTIONS: CASE WATCH](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/maze-1804511_960_720.jpg?resize=636%2C310&ssl=1)
This section looks at decisions in relation to relief from sanctions and the general principles of CPR 3.9. Often there are links to the decisions themselves, together with links to posts on this blog. A USEFUL GUIDE – BY SUBJECT…
![WHOSE EXPERT EVIDENCE IS GOING TO BE ACCEPTED AT TRIAL (CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE): WEBINAR 14th FEBRUARY 2025](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/medical_appointment_doctor_563427-3.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
Expert evidence plays a critical, often decisive, role in clinical negligence litigation. An ability to assess expert evidence is a key part of the litigator’s role. This webinar looks at the rules and cases that govern the credibility of expert…
![THE COURT DOES NOT HAVE POWER TO STRIKE OUT AN ORDER FOR AN ACCOUNT: AN APPLICATION THAT WAS "ILL JUDGED" AND "PUT FORWARD UNDER A JURISDICTION WHICH THE COURT PLAINLY DOES NOT HAVE"](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/AAsign_no_through_road.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
In Hubbard & Anor v Hubbard & Anor [2024] EWHC 3123 (Ch) Master Marsh (sitting in retirement) rejected a defendant’s application to strike out a claim for an account and for summary judgment for the defendant. The court had no…
![COST BITES 214: SHOULD THE COURT MAKE AN ORDER FOR COSTS AGAINST A CLAIMANT WHEN THE COSTS BUDGET HAS BEEN GREATLY REDUCED? THE ISSUES CONSIDERED](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/AAAcalculator_calculating_calculate_1276066-3.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
In Zavorotnii v Malinowski [2025] EWHC 260 (KB) HHJ Karen Walden-Smith considered the arguments as to whether a major reduction in a party’s costs budget should lead to an order for costs being made, rather than an order for costs…
![THIS CASE IS STAYING IN LONDON: (IT TOOK FROM 2ND JULY 2024 TO 14TH JANUARY 2025 FOR SUBMISSIONS TO BE PLACED BEFORE A JUDGE)](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/london_bus_england_britain.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
Since I wrote about a decision transferring Administrative Court proceedings to Leeds it is appropriate that we look at a decision today ordering that the proceedings stay in London despite it having closer ties to Manchester. In Weis, R (On…
![AN UNUSUAL SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM CASE: COURT GRANTS AN EXTENSION OF TIME IN JUDICIAL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE CORONER](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/attention_png_0-1.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
In Whittle v HM Coroner for North West Wales [2025] EWHC 236 (Admin) the Administrative Court dealt with an issue relating to failure to serve the claim form in time. The Court found a solution. However the judgment is important…
![THIS ACTION IS GOING TO YORKSHIRE: CHOICE OF LONDON LAWYERS DOES NOT DRIVE CHOICE OF VENUE](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/leeds_town_hall_general-1.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
In SK Enterprises (UK) Ltd, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Re Determination as to Venue) [2025] EWHC 237 (Admin) Mrs Justice Hill held that an action in the Administrative Court should be…
![FUNDAMENTAL DISHONESTY AND "WITHOUT PREJUDICE" CORRESPONDENCE: JUDGE HOLDS THAT CLAIMANT'S OFFER OF SETTLEMENT WAS ADMISSIBLE](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/letter_handwriting_ink_pen-1.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
In Morris v Williams [2025] EWHC 218 (KB) District Judge Dodsworth considered the question of whether a letter from the claimant’s former solicitor, which contained proposals by the claimant to settle allegations of fundamental dishonesty, could be adduced as evidence. …
![DENTON DID NOT APPLY TO THE DEFENDANT'S APPLICATION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME: HOWEVER - CONSIDERING THE OVERRIDING OBJECTIVE - THE APPLICATION WAS REFUSED](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/signs_dead_end_red-3.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
In Bailey & Ors v GlaxoSmithKline UK Ltd [2025] EWHC 186 (KB) Mr Justice Bourne considered whether the defendant should have an extension of time. The judge considered whether the “Denton” principles apply to the defendant’s application and if not…
![CAN AN EXPERT WORK ON A CONDITIONAL FEE BASIS? IT MAY BE POSSIBLE - BUT IS DEFINITELY NOT WISE](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/unbalanced_scales_too_far_0-1.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
I am grateful to Professor Keith Rix for allowing me to use an article that appears in February’s Expert Healthcare Witness Matters*. This deals with the question of whether an expert can, or should, agree to act on a conditional…
![COSTS BITES 214: LAWYERS DO YOU WANT TO WORK FOR NOTHING? THE DEFENDANTS' DAMAGE BASED AGREEMENTS WERE NOT VALID AND COSTS WERE NOT RECOVERABLE UNDER A COSTS ORDER: WHY SOLICITORS NEED TO THINK ABOUT THEIR RETAINERS CAREFULLY](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/calculator_calculating_calculate_1276066-1.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
If ever there was a case that highlighted the need for solicitors to consider the terms of the retainer with care, and know the law relating to Damages Based Agreements in detail, it is the judgment of Costs Judge Brown…
![SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: THE CORRECT ADDRESS ON THE ENVELOPE AND THE "LAST KNOWN RESIDENCE" CONSIDERED BY THE HIGH COURT](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/building_facade_british_homes.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
In Xenfin Fund 1 Trading Ltd v GFG Ltd & Ors [2025] EWHC 172 (Ch) Joanna Wicks KC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) considered two issues relating to service of the claim form. Firstly whether a slightly wrong…
![ADVOCACY THE JUDGE'S VIEW XV: REMEMBER JUDGES MAY BE TALKING ABOUT YOU: ADVICE FROM THE STREETS OF SAN FRANCISCO](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/san_francisco_by_night.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
Here we look at an interview with San Francisco Superior Court Judge, Curtis Karnow. The interview was about a book the judge had written “Litigation in Practice“, which is available in the UK. The original interview by is Ros Todd. As…
![WHEN A PARTY CITES, AND RELIES, ON CASE LAW THAT "DOES NOT EXIST" :"A MOST UNHAPPY FEATURE OF THIS CASE"](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/canadian_law_books.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
There is a very unusual element to the judgment of Mr Justice Kerr in Olsen & Anor v Finansiel Stabilitet A/S [2025] EWHC 42 (KB). The appellants, litigants in person, relied on case law that apparently supported their case. That…
![WHOSE EXPERT EVIDENCE IS GOING TO BE ACCEPTED AT TRIAL (?) PERSONAL INJURY: WEBINAR 7th FEBRUARY 2025](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/digital_smart_media_png_23.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
This blog regularly features cases where there have been issues, sometimes major problems, with expert evidence. This webinar takes a close look at the factors that the courts take into account when considering which expert’s view should be accepted. It…
![WHEN EXPERT EVIDENCE GOES WRONG : THE IMPORTANCE OF ACCURATE INFORMATION BEING GIVEN TO THE EXPERT](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/form_character_pen_1264999.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
We have looked at the judgment in Aviva Insurance Ltd v Nadeem & Anor [2024] EWHC 3445 (KB) HHJ Tindal (sitting as Judge of the High Court) before, in the context of the failure of committal proceedings following an earlier finding…
!["THIS CASE ...HAS COME BEFORE THIS COURT IN SUCH A DISORDERED AND CHAOTIC STATE THAT IT IS SIMPLY IMPOSSIBLE TO PROCEED IN A FAIR WAY](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/detour_confusion_sign_direction.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
In T v T & Ors (Disregard for Procedural Rules, Adjournment) [2025] EWFC 14 (B) Recorder Chandler KC set out a large number of matters on which the applicant had failed to comply with the rules. It is a judgment…
![AN INSURER CAN CONTINUE AN APPEAL AFTER THE APPELLANT HAS BEEN DISSOLVED: JOIN ITSELF INTO THE ACTION](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/cardiff_castle_castle_open.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
The Court of Appeal decision in Birley & Anor v Heritage Independent Living Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 44 also dealt with an interesting point of procedure. The appellant company had been dissolved shortly before the appeal was heard. The Court of…
![FAILING TO SERVE THE CLAIM FORM IS NOT AN "ABUSE OF PROCESS" SO AS TO LEAD TO QOCS BEING DISAPPLIED: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/warning_triangle_accident_highway-1.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
We are returning to the decision of the Court of Appeal in Court of Appeal in Birley & Anor v Heritage Independent Living Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 44. The Court upheld a finding that the failure to serve the claim form, or…
![AN APPLICATION - AND ORDER - FOR A STAY OF PROCEEDINGS DOES NOT LEAD TO TIME FOR SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM BEING EXTENDED: A POINT TO WATCH](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/puzzle_missing_particles_654963-1.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
It was possible that we could get to the end of January without a claim form case being reported. It was, however, unlikely. A failure to serve was one of the many issues considered by the Court of Appeal in…
![COST BITES 213: HOW DOES THE COURT APPROACH ASSESSMENT WHEN COSTS ARE DEDUCTED FROM THE CLIENT'S DAMAGES](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/justice_scales_balance_lawyer-5.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
We are returning, for the final post (for the time being at least) to the judgment of Cost Judge Rowley in Perrett v Wolferstans LLP [2025] EWHC 68 (SCCO). The judge considered the question of how the costs should be…
![INSURER FAILS IN COMMITTAL PROCEEDINGS AFTER A COURT HAD EARLIER MADE FINDINGS OF FUNDAMENTAL DISHONESTY TO THE CRIMINAL STANDARD: MANY TROUBLING THINGS HERE](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2007_chevrolet_hhr_involved-1.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
In Aviva Insurance Ltd v Nadeem & Anor [2024] EWHC 3445 (KB) HHJ Tindal (sitting as Judge of the High Court) dismissed an action for committal against someone who had been found to be fundamentally dishonest at a personal injury…
![COST BITES 212: ARGUMENTS ABOUT DEDUCTIONS OF COSTS FROM CLIENT'S DAMAGES: THE CONSUMER RIGHTS ACT 2015 AND THE SRA CODE OF CONDUCT](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/info_information_tips_icon_9.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
We are again returning to the judgment of Cost Judge Rowley in Perrett v Wolferstans LLP [2025] EWHC 68 (SCCO). Here we examine the claimant’s (former client’s) arguments in relation to the deduction of costs breaching the Consumer Rights Act 2015…
![COST BITES 211: THE ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: LARGE ELEMENTS OF POINTS OF DISPUTE STRUCK OUT BECAUSE OF INADEQUATE PARTICULARISATION](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/build_bers_scale_craft.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
In St Francis Group 1 Ltd & Ors v Kelly & Anor [2025] EWHC 125 (SCCO) Costs Judge Leonard struck out large parts of a defendant’s Points of Dispute. The Points of Dispute were inadequately particularised. The judgment contains an…
![COST BITES 210: INTERIM BILLS WERE NOT STATUTE BILLS: THE CLIENT HAS THE RIGHT TO AN ASSESSMENT OF THE FINAL BILL: "SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES" CONSIDERED](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/folder_paperwork_office_accountant-3.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
I am grateful to barrister Thomas Mason for drawing my attention to the judgment of Senior Costs Judge Gordon-Saker in Topalsson GmbH v CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP [2025] EWHC 118 (SCCO). The judge determined that a series of…
![EXTRAORDINARY CONDUCT WHICH LED TO SOLICITOR'S UNLAWFUL DEDUCTION FROM A PROTECT PARTY'S DAMAGES: JUDGMENT FROM THE SCCO](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/What.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
In AKS v National Farmers Union Mutual Insurance Society Ltd [2025] EWHC 126 (SCCO) Costs Judge Leonard recounted an extraordinary set of facts where a solicitor had wrongly deducted sums from their client’s damages. The judgment shows that this issue…
![ADVOCACY - THE JUDGE'S VIEW XIV: "RAMBO TACTICS" DO NOT WORK (NEITHER DO THREATENING YOUR OPPONENT WITH A PROCTOLOGY EXAMINATION OR MAKING FACES AT THE JUDGE...)](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/warrior_karate_japanese_toy.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
Continuing with revisiting guidance from judges in relation to advocacy. Here I advocate (hopefully in a civil way) learning from one judgment. That is the judgment of District Judge Chin in the extraordinary case of Revson -v- Cinque & Cinque in…
![TERMS OF SETTLEMENT WITH OTHER CLAIMANTS INADMISSIBLE AT TRIAL: "THE NEED TO PROMOTE THE POLICY TO ENCOURAGE SETTLEMENT IN ALL CASES"](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/handshake_simple_bw_png.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
In Omanovic v Shamaazi Ltd & Anor [2025] EWHC 110 (KB) Mr Justice Martin Spencer granted the defendants’ application that the terms of settlement with two claimants were inadmissible in the trial of the remaining claimant. On the facts of…
![COST BITES 209: A CLIENT’S CHALLENGE TO THE DEDUCTION OF THEIR OWN SOLICITOR’S COSTS WAS THIS A CFA OR A DBA: WAS THE SOLICITOR OBLIGED TO OFFER A DBA?](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/info_question_mark_png-1.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
We are continuing with the examination of the judgment of Cost Judge Rowley Perrett v Wolferstans LLP [2025] EWHC 68 (SCCO). Here the judge considered (and rejected) that claimant’s [former client’s] argument that the CFA entered into with the solicitor was…
![COURT REFUSES PERMISSION TO RELY ON EXPERT EVIDENCE: AN "INAPPROPRIATE DISTRACTION": A REPORT WAS "IN FACT LEGAL ARGUMENTS DRESSED UP AS ECONOMIC EXPERTISE"](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/river_thames_boats_vessels.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
In Kington SARL v Thames Water Utilities Holdings Ltd (Rev1) [2025] EWHC 84 (Ch) Mr Justice Trower rejected the applicant’s application to rely on expert evidence. The proposed expert report was to “uncertain” and, in any event, unlikely to assist…
![AVOIDING THE PITFALLS IN SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: WEBINAR 4th FEBRUARY 2025: CAN YOU AFFORD TO MISS IT?](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/error_play_stone_letters_0.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
Every year this blog covers numerous cases where claimants (and occasionally defendants) come to grief in relation to service of the claim form. The frustrating issue in relation to service issues is that most (if not all) of the problems…
![ADVOCACY - THE JUDGE'S VIEW XIII: GUIDANCE ON SKELETON ARGUMENTS: "PUT YOURSELF IN THE POSITION OF THE JUDGE": "DIFFICULT TO READ, DISGUSTING TO TOUCH AND IMPOSSIBLE TO UNDERSTAND. IT IS WORSE THAN NO SKELETON AT ALL"](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/skeleton_sewer_chalk_art-1.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
This post is another in the series of repeats of the series on advocacy. This blog has many posts that record cases where judges have been critical of the contents (and usually length) of skeleton arguments. A remedy for most…
![COST BITES 208: A CLIENT'S CHALLENGE TO THE DEDUCTION OF THEIR OWN SOLICITOR'S COSTS IN PERSONAL INJURY ACTION](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/the_scream_pastel-1.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
There is a strange area of litigation and legal costs where issues of proportionality and common sense appear to totally disappear. – that is former client’s challenges to solicitor’s deductions from damages. We see another example in Perrett v Wolferstans…
![COST BITES 207: THE BREAKDOWN OF EXPERT FEES WHEN AN AGENCY IS INVOLVED (AGAIN): THE RECEIVING PARTY, APPLES AND PEARS AND AN ELECTION HAS TO BE MADE](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/apple_pear_fruit_ripe.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
In JXX v Archibald [2025] EWHC 69 (SCCO) Costs Judge Rowley considered the – much debated and litigated – issue of whether there needs to be breakdown of an expert’s fee when the expert is instructed through an agency. The…
![THE IMPORTANCE OF ADVOCATES WORKING WITHIN TIME ESTIMATES: COURT OF APPEAL POLICE THEIR PROCEDURE](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/police_gazette_or_hue-1.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
In Chief Constable of Northamptonshire Police v Woodcock [2025] EWCA Civ 13 the Court of Appeal considered many significant issues relating to the civil liability of the police force. However this blog, being this blog, will defer consideration of those…
![THE COSTS JUDGE OVER YOUR SHOULDER: MAXIMISING COSTS RECOVERY ON AN INTER PARTIES RECOVER - THE LITIGATOR'S ROLE: WEBINAR 23rd JANUARY 2025](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/calculator_keys_input_count.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
Detailed assessment usually takes place after attempts at settlement of costs have failed and there are some major differences between the parties. The webinar uses examples from reported cases to show where failures and omissions by the receiving party has…
In Packer v Packer [2025] EWHC 27 (Ch) HHJ Paul Matthews (sitting as a High Court Judge) considered issues of costs after a claimant had amended a Reply to withdraw an allegation of fraud. The judge did not accept the…
![CAN A CLAIMANT WHO HAS ISSUED PART 8 PROCEEDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF AN INTERIM PAYMENT BE COMPELLED TO TRANSFER THE ACTION TO PART 7: THE COURT THINKS NOT](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/track_running_sport_numbers.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
I am grateful to Chris Barnes KC for allowing me to rely on his note of a post he put on LinkedIn yesterday. It relates to the question of whether a court can “convert” Part 8 proceedings issued for the…
![MISCONDUCT IN ASSESSMENT AND REDUCTIONS IN COSTS – A REVIEW OF THE CASES II: KERINS -V- HEART OF ENGLAND: COSTS REDUCED BY 50%](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/medical_record_health_patient-2.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
We are continuing this series looking at issues of misconduct in the assessment process by looking at the decision of District Judge Griffith in Kerins -v- Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust (Birmingham, 31st July 2015). The claimant’s costs were reduced by…
In Manchester Property Development Holdings & Anor v Kuit Steinart Levy LLP [2025] EWHC 35 (Comm) Dame Clare Moulder DBE granted the defendant’s application for an adjournment of an imminent trial because Leading Counsel became unexpectedly ill. There was insufficient…
![MISCONDUCT IN ASSESSMENT AND REDUCTIONS IN COSTS - A REVIEW OF THE CASES 1: LAHEY -v- PIRELLI TYRES LIMITED](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/calculator_calculation_casio_424564.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
Recent cases on the issue of costs being reduced, or disallowed, due to the conduct of the assessment proceedings have led me to review the cases on this topic. This is the first in a series of posts about the…
![ADVOCACY THE JUDGE'S VIEW XII: BEING PERSUASIVE - SIMPLE IS BEST: "CONVOLUTED ARGUMENTS ARE SLEEPING PILLS ON PAPER"](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/swissy_sleep.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
This post revisits the detailed article by Judge Stephen J. Dwyer, Leonard J. Feldman & Ryan P. McBridet called “How to Write, Edit, and Review Persuasive Briefs: Seven Guidelines from One Judge and Two Lawyers”. Remember the purpose of this…
![THREE WEBINARS ON COSTS TO START OF THE CALENDAR (IF NOT THE FINANCIAL) YEAR](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/slide_rule_count_math.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
There are three webinars on costs this January of interest to most litigators. The first deals with the summary assessment of costs; the second the role of the litigator in detailed assessments and the third on the topic of deducting…
![ADVOCACY THE JUDGE'S VIEW XI: ADVOCACY BEFORE THE MASTERS: YOU ARE DEALING WITH EXPERTS AND TIMING IS IMPORTANT](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/bear_cub_animal_tree.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
Today we are revisiting an article by Master David Cook “Advocacy before the QB Masters – Some Do’s and Dont’s” and it reminded me why I wrote the original series. These are invaluable sources of advice and information. Appearing before Masters…
![COST BITES 205: THE COURT CAN CHANGE ITS MIND AFTER MAKING AN ORDER ON THE PAPERS: THE DANGERS OF "ETERNAL GAMES OF PING PONG"](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/table_tennis_ping_pong_24.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
In Smith v McAlpine [2024] EWHC 3408 (KB) Senior Master Cook varied an order for costs that had been made after an application had been considered on the papers. After considering further submissions he found that his original order, that…
![OGDEN TABLES UPDATED TO INCLUDE + 0.5% RATE](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/calculator_old_vintage_1573551-1.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
An updated set of Additional Tables have been added to The Ogden Tables today to include the 0.5% rate that came into force in January. THE UPDATES The updates can be found on this link.
![BITCOINS IN THE TIP: DEFENDANT COUNCIL GRANTED SUMMARY JUDGMENT: CLAIMANT'S ARGUMENT ON LIMITATION DESCRIBED AS "DESPERATE"](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Landfillblack_white_old_photo_0.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
In Howells v Newport City Council [2025] EWHC 22 (Ch) HHJ Keyser KC granted summary judgment to the defendant council in an unusual case. The claimant was seeking to recover a computer hard drive which had been put in the…
![MAKING AN APPLICATION FOR RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS? 10 KEY POINTS TO HELP](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Problem-pexels-photo-5428833.jpeg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
Periodically I revisit posts on this blog to see whether they remain of relevance – this post (from January 2016) does. It sets out ten key points in making an application for relief from sanctions. Every point made nine years…
![PROVING THINGS 254: WHICH EXPERT IS GOING TO BE ACCEPTED? AN IMPORTANT ISSUE CONSIDERED IN A CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASE](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/pexels-photo-5752267.jpeg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
I am grateful to barrister Nadia Whittaker for sending me a copy of the judgment of HHJ Baddeley in Lochrie -v- Edwards (County Court in Sheffield 07/01/2025), a copy of which is available here. Final Lochrie v Edwards Judgment G48YJ355 …
![FAMILY COURT AND CIVIL COUNTY COURT LEEDS: NOT ACCEPTING DIRECT CALLS FROM THE 22nd JANUARY 2025](https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Telephone-150x150.avif)
HMCTS have sent out a letter informing practitioners of changes to the telephone arrangements in Leeds Family Court and Civil County Court in Leeds from the 22nd January 2025. Note that the Business and Property Court is not affected. “New…